Aproko Doctor Slams JAMB Over Technical Glitch and Mass Failure in 2025 UTME

In a recent development, popular content creator Aproko Doctor has openly criticized the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) over their official statement addressing the technical glitch that occurred during the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). The glitch reportedly affected 157 of the 887 examination centers, leading to a significant drop in candidate performance. JAMB, in a tweet from their official handle @JAMBHQ, stated, "Man Proposes, God Disposes! It has been established that a technical glitch affected 157 centres out of the 887 centres in the 2025 UTME. This was basically responsible for the general low performance of the candidates scheduled to sit the examination in those centres."

However, the statement did not sit well with Aproko Doctor, a well-known public health advocate and social media influencer. He responded sharply via his Twitter handle @aproko_doctor, commenting, "When you're asked to describe the anyhowness, show them this tweet from a national agency." The tweet has since sparked widespread reactions on social media, with many users expressing dissatisfaction with JAMB’s response to the technical challenges faced by students.

The controversy began when numerous candidates who sat for the 2025 UTME voiced their frustration over unexpected technical difficulties that reportedly disrupted their exams. According to affected students, issues ranged from login failures to abrupt system shutdowns, leaving them unable to complete their tests. As the complaints mounted, JAMB acknowledged the problem but described the situation in a manner that many perceived as dismissive and nonchalant.

Critics of JAMB’s response argue that the agency failed to take adequate responsibility for the disruption and instead offered an explanation that seemed to trivialize the concerns of affected candidates. Aproko Doctor’s reaction reflects the sentiments of many who feel that JAMB’s choice of words in addressing the issue was insensitive and unprofessional, especially given the high stakes of the UTME in determining university admissions.

Social media users rallied behind Aproko Doctor’s criticism, amplifying calls for JAMB to adopt a more accountable and transparent approach in handling the situation. Some suggested that JAMB should have issued an apology or outlined steps to remedy the issue rather than making a vague reference to divine intervention. As the controversy grew, educational stakeholders also weighed in, with some calling for a thorough investigation into how the technical glitch occurred and how it could be prevented in the future.

The UTME is an essential examination in Nigeria, serving as a gateway for students seeking admission into tertiary institutions. Therefore, any disruption in the examination process can significantly affect the academic future of many young Nigerians. In light of this, Aproko Doctor’s critical stance has resonated with parents, educators, and students alike, who believe that the educational body should prioritize resolving technical issues and offer concrete solutions rather than issuing statements perceived as dismissive.

As pressure mounts, JAMB is yet to release a follow-up statement addressing the public outcry. Many are keenly awaiting a more detailed explanation and a possible resolution for affected candidates, including whether there will be a re-sit for those whose performance was compromised. Meanwhile, Aproko Doctor’s tweet continues to trend, serving as a rallying point for Nigerians demanding better accountability from national institutions.

While JAMB’s statement has sparked outrage, it has also reignited discussions about the persistent technical challenges plaguing the UTME. Critics argue that JAMB should invest more in infrastructure and system upgrades to minimize disruptions during exams. Moreover, they call for a transparent audit of the affected centers to understand the root cause of the glitch.

Aproko Doctor, known for his insightful commentary on societal issues, has once again positioned himself as a voice of the people, challenging authorities to do better. His outspoken stance on the JAMB issue not only highlights the frustrations of affected candidates but also underscores the need for public institutions to communicate with more empathy and clarity when addressing matters of national importance.

As Nigerians continue to debate the situation online, one question remains at the forefront: Will JAMB take responsibility for the exam glitch and work towards preventing a recurrence, or will the agency continue to downplay the situation with nonchalant statements? The resolution to this controversy will likely set a precedent for how educational authorities address technical failures in the future.

For now, Aproko Doctor’s bold critique serves as a reminder that public accountability remains essential, especially when the futures of thousands of students are at stake.