
A heated debate has erupted online after a young woman narrated how her friend complained about being sent to a local university by her uncle while his own children were enrolled in prestigious schools abroad. The incident, shared on social media by user Bavina (@sifabavina), has quickly spiraled into a viral conversation about gratitude, entitlement, family responsibility, and the realities of fostering children after the death of their parents.
According to Bavina, her friend had lost her mother at a young age and was taken in by her uncle, who assumed responsibility for her welfare and education. The uncle reportedly sponsored her through school, enrolling her at the University of Nairobi (UON). However, while doing so, he also sent his own children to the United Kingdom for their studies. This apparent disparity became the source of her friend’s frustration and bitterness, as she felt shortchanged by the decision.
In her words, Bavina revealed, “I know a friend who complained her uncle took her to UON while his kids went to UK when their mom died—and I’m like this man took you in and took you through school and you can’t even have gratitude.” Her post immediately triggered a wave of reactions, with many people taking strong positions on whether the young woman had a right to feel the way she did or whether she should be eternally grateful for the sacrifice her uncle made.
For some commentators, the complaint came across as an act of deep ingratitude. They argued that the uncle’s decision to take her in and shoulder her educational expenses was already a massive responsibility that he was not obliged to bear. Given that he had his own children to provide for, critics insisted it was unfair for the young lady to expect to receive the same treatment as his biological children. The fact that she was given the chance to get a degree at a reputable university in Kenya was, in their view, a blessing she should not take for granted.
One user, @vee, weighed in passionately on the matter, pointing out that while the uncle’s effort was commendable, the dynamics of fostering go beyond mere financial capacity. In her tweet, she wrote, “When the siblings of your parents take you in after loss, I will say this slowly. It is not supposed to be helping out. It’s supposed to be ‘One of my own.’ This is not about capacity. The uncle made a conscious choice to ‘help out.’ I am not arguing with anyone on this.”
This perspective introduced another dimension to the debate: the idea that when relatives step in to raise orphaned children, they should treat them with the same fairness, love, and consideration as they do their own offspring. To some, sending the uncle’s children abroad while keeping his niece at a local university reflected a disparity that could leave her feeling like a second-class member of the family. Supporters of this view stressed that fostering should mean integration, not segregation.
The conversation quickly drew in other social media users who highlighted how delicate these situations can be. Some insisted that while the uncle’s action of taking her in was praiseworthy, it did not erase the possibility that the girl felt left behind and sidelined. Education, they argued, is not just about access but also about opportunity, exposure, and future networks. By sending his children abroad, the uncle was offering them a different level of advantage that he denied his niece, perhaps unintentionally, thereby creating feelings of inferiority.
Others, however, disagreed sharply, arguing that such comparisons were misplaced and unfair. They emphasized that no two people’s life circumstances are identical, even within the same family. For them, the niece should count her blessings and recognize that her uncle’s primary responsibility was to his own children, not her. Any support he extended to her should be seen as an act of generosity, not an entitlement.
Adding a satirical touch, Twitter user Oladipo (@DipoAW) chimed in with humor, remarking, “Brought to you by mouth is good motors,” suggesting that people were too quick to complain rather than appreciate what they already had.
This clash of perspectives underscores a much larger societal conversation about family obligations, especially in African cultures where communal living and extended family ties often play a pivotal role. In many communities, it is common for uncles, aunts, or even grandparents to step in when children are left without parents. However, the expectations placed on such guardians are not always clear-cut. Should they provide just the basics—food, shelter, and education—or are they morally bound to ensure the fostered child receives exactly the same standard of care and opportunity as their own?
The case also brings to light the emotional struggles of children in such situations. While outsiders may see being sponsored through school as enough, those living it often feel the sting of comparison. Watching their cousins, who live under the same roof, enjoy better opportunities can fuel resentment, self-doubt, and a sense of being less loved or valued. Psychologists note that this can leave long-term scars, even if the intentions of the guardian were good.
Still, there is no denying that fostering requires immense sacrifice. In an era where the cost of living and education continues to rise, taking on another child is no small feat. Many argued that the uncle likely had financial limitations and could not afford to send both his own children and his niece abroad. For them, his choice to prioritize his children while still ensuring his niece received a university education in Nairobi was both reasonable and justifiable.
Yet the emotional weight of such disparities cannot be overlooked. Children, particularly teenagers and young adults, are keenly aware of differences in treatment. A niece sent to UON while her cousins study in the UK might understandably feel left out, even if her uncle did the best he could. Gratitude and resentment can coexist, making the situation far more complex than it seems on the surface.
As the debate rages on, it serves as a sobering reminder that family dynamics are rarely straightforward, especially when loss and guardianship are involved. For some, the story is a lesson in gratitude—an encouragement to appreciate those who step in during moments of crisis, even if their support is not perfect. For others, it is a call to guardians and extended family members to remember that