“No Man Can Beat Me”: Relationship Guru Blessing CEO Denies Reports of Domestic Violence, Says She Was Robbed

Relationship expert and social media entrepreneur Blessing CEO went live to address swirling online reports that she had been physically assaulted, telling followers she was safe, that she had been robbed, and that the viral narrative of a domestic attack was false. In a measured, at-times defiant video broadcast, Blessing repeatedly rejected claims that she had been physically harmed and urged the public to wait for the outcome of an ongoing investigation before drawing conclusions.

“I’m okay, guys. Nobody hit me, but I was robbed and I don’t want to go into details yet because the investigation is ongoing. And nothing happened to my eye, please,” she told viewers, speaking calmly and directly to the camera. The statement, delivered in a tone intended to close off speculation, was part clarification and part admonition to those who had rushed to judgment online. Blessing — who has cultivated a large following by coaching people on relationship boundaries, self-respect and emotional resilience — said she would limit public comment while authorities work, warning that further commentary could be misread as performance for social media.

Blessing’s response came after a flurry of social media posts and comments that suggested she had been the victim of a severe domestic incident. The content, widely shared across platforms, included unverified claims and vivid speculation about the circumstances of the alleged attack. In the live video, Blessing confronted that speculation head-on, saying she had followed the same rules she preaches to clients: set firm boundaries and refuse to be dragged into narratives that do not reflect the facts.

“Someone even said I was lying. I’m here to set the record straight,” she told followers, addressing the swirl of accusations and sympathy in equal measure. The message resonated with two core themes in Blessing’s brand: personal strength and vocal boundary enforcement. Her claim — both a denial of physical assault and an assertion of authority over the narrative of her own life — shifts focus from sensational online chatter to the unresolved facts of a criminal inquiry she says remains active.

At one point in the live video Blessing moved from clarification to confrontation, almost daring online critics to test her. “Nobody can beat me, even IVD can’t beat me — we will fight. I have passed the level of a man beating me; any man that touches me I will use 2by2 on him,” she declared, using the familiar language of her coaching persona to emphasize resilience. The remark, blending bravado and a reference to self-defense, was striking in its frankness: a public figure renowned for offering counsel on love and self-worth also signaled she would defend herself, physically or legally, if pushed into a corner.

Observers and followers had mixed reactions. Some applauded her forthrightness and praised the way she modeled the boundary-setting she teaches, arguing that her refusal to be portrayed as a victim sends an empowering message. Others criticized the combative tone, suggesting it risked escalating tensions or diminishing empathy for survivors of violence. A third group urged caution, saying that in the absence of verified facts, it is irresponsible to cast aspersions in either direction.

Blessing’s live address also touched on the psychology of rumor in the age of social media. She warned against what she described as “unhelpful drama” and asked that followers respect the investigative process. “I’m not going to talk much because people will think I’m here to justify Instagram allegation,” she said, signaling a desire to let official channels establish what happened rather than engage in a back-and-forth that would only feed social feeds and speculation.

Legal experts watching similar cases say the dilemma Blessing faces is common: victims or alleged victims who are public figures must navigate a double bind — speak and risk being accused of performative behavior, or stay silent and let rumors metastasize. Both choices carry reputational and emotional costs. For Blessing, the choice to go live appears to be a calibrated attempt to assert control over the narrative without derailing official inquiries.

The episode also raises broader questions about how figures who counsel others on relationships are perceived when their private lives become public dramas. For some followers, Blessing’s insistence that she was not assaulted could strengthen confidence in her teachings — a demonstration that she practices what she preaches, refusing to be defined as powerless. For skeptics, the incident invites scrutiny into the pressures and contradictions that public-facing advice-givers can encounter when real-life messiness collides with brand messaging.

Regardless of how social media divides fall, Blessing’s handling of the moment underscores the limits of online judgment and the dangers of viral rumor. Her request that the public refrain from leap-to-conclusion narratives while law enforcement completes its work is not only about preserving her own reputation; it is also a reminder of how fast misinformation can travel in the digital age, often outpacing facts and official statements.

The live video closed with a mix of resolve and restraint. Blessing thanked followers for their concern but asked for patience and room for authorities to investigate. She reiterated that she would not be drawn into unproductive exchanges online and insisted on retaining the dignity of the process rather than turning the moment into a spectacle for followers or critics. “I’m here to set the record straight,” she said once more, a phrase that framed the live session as both clarification and defense.

As the investigation continues, Blessing’s supporters and critics alike will be watching for formal statements from law enforcement or legal filings that shed light on the events she described as a robbery. Until then, what remains clear is that a public figure who built her identity around strength, boundaries and no-nonsense relationship advice has used those same principles to respond to one of the most personal kinds of crises a public life can face. Whether that strategy will ultimately protect her reputation or intensify scrutiny is something only the unfolding facts — not the hashtags and hot takes — will determine.