"She Is Treating Him the Way She Wants to Be Treated" - x user comments on Veekee James' Birthday Surprise for Husband

Social media has been set abuzz following a controversial tweet by a x user Wizarab, who weighed in on fashion designer Veekee James’ recent birthday surprise for her husband, Femi. The debate ignited when Wizarab, known for his often polarizing views, criticized the way Veekee celebrated her husband's birthday, claiming that she treated him as she would like to be treated rather than how a man desires to be treated.

The controversy erupted after Veekee James, a celebrated gospel artist and fashion enthusiast, posted clips and photos of the surprise birthday celebration she organized for her husband. The visuals showed Femi being treated to a lavish, carefully curated celebration, complete with decorations, gifts, and heartfelt displays of affection. While the gesture seemed heartwarming to many, Wizarab's critique quickly garnered attention, sparking a heated debate across social media platforms.

Taking to Twitter, Wizarab wrote, "It is not cute. I don't know one man who likes this. Some things are just feminine. Treat a man like a man. She is treating him the way she wants to be treated, not as a man should be treated." The tweet, which has since been widely circulated, drew mixed reactions from users who either supported his stance or condemned it as outdated and sexist.

Supporters of Wizarab’s perspective argued that his remarks reflected a deeper issue regarding how some women might project their personal desires onto their male partners, failing to consider the differences in how men prefer to be celebrated or appreciated. One commenter wrote, "Men and women are different. What makes a woman feel special might not necessarily make a man feel the same way. Wizarab has a point."

On the other hand, critics of Wizarab's opinion accused him of reinforcing harmful stereotypes about masculinity, arguing that there is no universal standard for how a man should be treated. One vocal opponent tweeted, "Why should there be a set rule on how to treat a man? Everyone is different. If Veekee knows her husband and he appreciates the gesture, then what's the problem?"

Amidst the debate, Veekee James has remained silent, not directly addressing the controversy. However, some of her fans have jumped to her defense, praising the singer for publicly celebrating her husband in a way that reflects her love and admiration. In their view, Wizarab's critique lacks merit, as it disregards the individuality of relationships and the personal dynamics between partners.

Relationship experts and social commentators have since weighed in on the matter, emphasizing that relationships are highly personal, and how one expresses love or appreciation should be dictated by the couple's preferences rather than rigid societal norms. According to Dr. Chioma Okeke, a relationship therapist, "There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to showing love. It’s about knowing your partner's love language and acting accordingly. Criticizing a loving gesture just because it doesn’t fit traditional gender roles is both unfair and unnecessary."

The discourse has also opened up a larger conversation on gender expectations and relationship norms, with some users questioning why certain actions are automatically labeled as feminine or masculine. This topic has been particularly engaging for younger audiences who increasingly challenge conventional gender stereotypes and advocate for more fluid expressions of love and affection.

In contrast, those siding with Wizarab’s stance maintain that certain gestures, especially those perceived as more sentimental or grand, are traditionally seen as things women might enjoy more than men. They argue that such displays might put undue pressure on male partners who may not feel comfortable being the center of attention in that way.

The debate has highlighted a recurring issue in relationship dynamics: the assumption that men and women should be treated differently when it comes to romantic gestures. Some voices within the discussion have called for a more nuanced understanding, where the focus should be less on whether a gesture aligns with gender expectations and more on whether it makes the person feel valued and loved.

As the online discourse continues to rage, one thing remains clear: the way we perceive relationships and romantic gestures is evolving. In a society increasingly pushing back against rigid gender norms, Wizarab's tweet has, intentionally or not, sparked a necessary conversation about how couples express love and whether personal preferences should outweigh societal expectations.

Whether or not Veekee James will address the controversy remains to be seen. Meanwhile, the story continues to trend, with social media users sharing their own perspectives on what it means to treat a partner in a way that feels authentic and loving. As opinions remain divided, one can’t help but wonder if the real issue lies not in the gesture itself but in society's reluctance to embrace diverse expressions of love.