Neo Akpofure Demands Retraction and Public Apology After University Assault Allegation Resurfaces

Big Brother Naija star Neo Akpofure has fired back at serious allegations that recently resurfaced online, demanding a full retraction and a public apology from the woman who accused him of a sexual assault incident dating back to their university days. In an emotional statement posted to his social media platforms, Neo rejected the claims as false and stressed that he would pursue legal action if they were not withdrawn.

The controversy began when a woman, whose identity has not been publicly disclosed, posted on social media alleging that Neo had assaulted her while they were both students in university. Her post went viral quickly, reigniting conversations around accountability, celebrity culture, and the handling of past traumas in the digital age. Within hours, supporters and critics on both sides weighed in, and the story dominated feeds across platforms.

Neo responded swiftly, issuing a video and written statement in which he described the allegations as “untrue and defamatory.” He said the claims have caused significant harm to his reputation and emotional well‑being, especially given how widely they have spread. “I have never engaged in any form of non‑consensual act with anyone,” he wrote. “These allegations are false, and I demand an immediate retraction and a public apology.”

While Neo did not disclose specific details of the university period in question, he emphasized that he stands by his record and will take appropriate legal steps to protect his name if necessary. His legal team has reportedly begun preparing documentation to pursue defamation charges should the accuser refuse to retract her statements.

The woman’s posts did not include extensive details but referenced an incident that she says occurred years ago. In her original message, she spoke about carrying pain from that time and the importance of speaking out in support of survivors. Social media users quickly shared screenshots and comments, sparking widespread debate.

The rapid spread of the accusation drew reactions from fellow entertainers, fans, and commentators. Some publicly supported the accuser for coming forward, while others urged restraint and respect for due process, noting that accusations—especially those involving serious matters—must be handled with care and should not rely solely on social media.

A number of voices in the entertainment industry expressed sympathy for Neo, highlighting his philanthropic work and career achievements since his time on Big Brother Naija. Others used the moment to call for broader conversations about how allegations of past misconduct should be addressed responsibly, particularly when the alleged events involve students and occurred years earlier.

Legal experts who spoke to media outlets emphasized that public accusations can have real legal consequences. Under Nigerian law, defamation is a serious matter, and individuals who make false statements that harm another’s reputation can face civil or criminal liability. Lawyers pointed out that if Neo’s team can prove the statements are false and have caused damage, the courts could order compensation or other remedies.

At the same time, advocates for survivors of abuse underscored the challenges faced by people coming forward with their experiences. They noted that many individuals do not report incidents at the time they happen due to fear, stigma, or lack of confidence in legal systems. While stressing the importance of evidence and fair process, these advocates encouraged respectful dialogue and better support for those who allege past harm.

The situation has also reignited conversations online about the impact of social media on reputation and justice. Platforms like Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok make it easy for stories to spread quickly, but they can also amplify misinformation or place public pressure on individuals before investigations take place. Some commentators argued that the focus should be on establishing facts through proper channels rather than judging based on viral posts.

Neo’s statement included an appeal to his fans to refrain from engaging in online attacks against the woman or spreading unverified information. “I ask that my supporters remain respectful and do not harass or threaten anyone,” he said in his statement. “This matter should be resolved through truth and the appropriate legal processes, not through intimidation or abuse.”

As of now, the accuser has not publicly responded to Neo’s demand for a retraction and apology. Her original post remains online, with thousands of comments and shares. Some commenters have called on her to provide more details or evidence, while others have defended her right to speak about her experiences.

The broader public reaction has been mixed. Some fans have expressed belief in Neo’s innocence, citing his behavior and character as they know him. Others have taken a more cautious approach, saying that allegations—especially on matters of personal harm—deserve careful consideration and sensitivity. Many social media users are urging both parties to seek resolution through legal avenues rather than letting the conflict play out in the court of public opinion.

Celebrities and influencers who previously worked with Neo have so far been largely silent, with only a few posting general messages about the importance of truth and fairness. One notable personality, who requested anonymity, told reporters that the entertainment community is watching closely and hopes the situation can be resolved without further damage to anyone involved.

Observers say this incident highlights challenges faced by public figures when allegations from their past resurface in the digital age. The court of public opinion often forms judgments rapidly, and individuals can suffer immediate consequences in their careers and personal lives before legal determinations occur. At the same time, social movements advocating for accountability and support for survivors continue to gain traction, encouraging people to speak up about their experiences.

Nigeria’s legal framework allows for both civil and criminal action in defamation cases, and experts say Neo’s lawyers appear to be positioning for a civil lawsuit seeking damages. Should the accuser choose to pursue her claims through official legal channels, the matter could evolve into a more complex and lengthy legal battle. Courts would then potentially examine evidence, testimonies, and timelines to determine the validity of the competing claims.

In the meantime, fans and followers of Neo Akpofure and the wider public are left to navigate a mix of sympathy, skepticism, and debate. Neo’s social media posts show a man determined to clear his name, while the accuser’s message has resonated with those who support survivors of past harm. What remains clear is that both sides have struck a chord, and the conversation is unlikely to disappear quickly.

As the situation develops, many are calling for a balanced approach that respects the rights of individuals to speak about their experiences while also protecting people from unsubstantiated claims that could irreparably harm their reputations. With legal processes potentially on the horizon and strong emotions on both sides, the story of Neo Akpofure’s response to these serious allegations continues to unfold in the public eye.