Controversial social critic, VeryDarkMan, has stirred significant public attention following his recent arrest by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), where he accused GTBank of holding him hostage. The outspoken personality, who has gained notoriety for his unfiltered critique of societal issues, took to social media to recount the ordeal, which he described as shocking and unwarranted.

The incident occurred shortly after VeryDarkMan's release from EFCC custody on bail. His detention had previously sparked nationwide protests and social media campaigns demanding his freedom. In a video that quickly went viral, he expressed heartfelt gratitude to protesters, entertainment figures, and public personalities who played pivotal roles in advocating for his release.

According to VeryDarkMan, the series of unfortunate events began when he visited a GTBank branch to investigate a financial discrepancy related to his mother’s account. During the investigation, it was revealed that his mother had unknowingly taken a loan of N200,000. As he was about to leave the bank premises, a security official approached him, obstructing his path without providing a clear reason for the interference.

VeryDarkMan described the moment as confusing and unsettling. He questioned the official’s authority and demanded an explanation, but none was given. In his own words, he said, 'The police didn’t even know why he stopped us. GTBank, you will explain why you held me hostage in your bank. I want to know why you held me in your bank for five minutes.'

Matters escalated when VeryDarkMan attempted to exit the bank in his vehicle. He recounted how security operatives suddenly blocked his car with their vehicles, fired gunshots into the air, and subsequently blindfolded him before forcing him into another vehicle. The abrupt and aggressive nature of the intervention left him and onlookers bewildered.

He strongly condemned the bank’s actions, alleging that the entire situation was orchestrated to intimidate and silence him. As someone known for his critical stance on issues affecting the common man, VeryDarkMan viewed the incident as an attempt to undermine his advocacy.

In his social media post, he did not mince words about his intention to pursue legal action against GTBank, demanding a thorough investigation into why he was allegedly held against his will. His declaration has since sparked conversations online, with many of his followers expressing solidarity and calling for justice. The hashtag #JusticeForVeryDarkMan began trending as supporters vowed to hold the institution accountable.

GTBank has yet to issue a formal statement regarding the incident, leaving the public and media speculating about the motivations behind the alleged actions. Some social media users speculated that the controversy surrounding the loan taken by VeryDarkMan's mother might have played a role, while others suggested that his outspoken nature made him a target for intimidation.

VeryDarkMan, however, remains adamant that the bank’s actions were unjustified. He reiterated that being held at the bank without any legal basis amounted to false imprisonment. He further alleged that the EFCC’s involvement appeared to be a coordinated effort to suppress his voice rather than a legitimate legal process.

Amid the outcry, legal experts weighed in on the situation, with some suggesting that if VeryDarkMan’s allegations are true, he may have grounds for a lawsuit based on unlawful detention and a breach of his fundamental rights. The potential lawsuit could involve both GTBank and the security operatives involved in the incident.

Supporters of VeryDarkMan have expressed concerns over what they perceive as the increasing use of law enforcement to silence outspoken individuals. Some activists called for transparency and accountability from both the bank and law enforcement agencies, emphasizing the importance of protecting freedom of speech and the right to protest.

In the meantime, the video of his account continues to gain traction, drawing responses from a wide range of public figures. Many have called for a thorough and unbiased investigation to ascertain the facts and ensure that justice is served. As the controversy unfolds, all eyes remain on GTBank’s next move and the potential legal implications that may follow.

VeryDarkMan’s ordeal has become emblematic of the struggle between vocal activism and institutional responses. His supporters believe that his resolve to challenge the bank legally will serve as a precedent for holding financial institutions accountable for actions perceived as abuses of power. As the story continues to develop, it remains uncertain whether GTBank will address the allegations directly or allow the legal process to take its course.

Regardless of the outcome, the incident has reignited debates around civil rights, corporate accountability, and the extent to which private institutions can exercise authority over individuals. For now, VeryDarkMan remains steadfast in his quest for justice, determined to ensure that the events that transpired do not go unchallenged.