“Oscar, Na Your Hurt?”: Yhemo Lee’s Sharp Clapback Ignites DNA Test Debate on Nigerian Social Media

Nollywood actor and social media personality Yhemo Lee has found himself at the centre of a heated online conversation after responding to a man who publicly advised him to conduct a DNA test on his son, a comment that many Nigerians have described as intrusive, disrespectful, and emblematic of a growing trend of unsolicited opinions about celebrity families. The exchange, which surfaced on social media via popular blog Instablog9ja, quickly went viral, drawing reactions that range from outright condemnation to uneasy reflection on trust, fatherhood, and boundaries in the digital age.

The drama began when a man identified as Oscar dropped a comment under a post related to Yhemo Lee and his child. Framing his words as concern, Oscar wrote, “Hope you already done DNA egbon? Cos I genuinely no wanna see you hurt, you love him so much.” Though couched in casual language and presented as friendly advice, the comment immediately raised eyebrows, as many users felt it crossed a personal line by questioning the paternity of a child without any public controversy or evidence to justify such doubt.

Yhemo Lee did not ignore the remark. Instead, he fired back with a response that was both sarcastic and dismissive, telling Oscar to “Make ona leave me abeg,” while pointedly asking, “Oscar na your hurt?” The reply, brief but loaded, was enough to spark widespread discussion across platforms like X, Instagram, and Facebook, with thousands of users weighing in on whether Oscar’s comment was inappropriate or whether DNA testing has simply become a normalized topic in modern relationships.

For many observers, the incident highlights how public figures in Nigeria are increasingly subjected to invasive scrutiny, even on matters as sensitive as their children. While celebrity culture often invites curiosity, critics argue that questioning a man’s paternity in a public forum goes beyond harmless gossip and veers into emotional provocation. Several users noted that advising someone to conduct a DNA test is not a neutral suggestion, but one that implies possible infidelity and deceit, potentially sowing seeds of doubt where none previously existed.

Supporters of Yhemo Lee applauded his restraint, saying his response was mild compared to the insult implied by the comment. They argued that if such a statement were directed at a private individual, it would be considered deeply offensive, and that celebrities should not be expected to tolerate behavior that would otherwise be socially unacceptable. Some pointed out that the tone of Oscar’s message, despite claiming concern, came across as patronizing, as though Yhemo Lee needed to be “saved” from a situation he never indicated was problematic.

On the other hand, a smaller but vocal group defended Oscar’s comment, framing it within the context of rising stories of disputed paternity in Nigeria, many of which have played out publicly on social media and in courtrooms. They argued that DNA testing has become a common precautionary topic in conversations about marriage and parenthood, especially given viral cases where men later discovered they were not the biological fathers of children they had raised for years. To this group, Oscar’s words, while poorly timed and publicly expressed, reflected a broader societal anxiety rather than a personal attack.

Still, relationship experts and commentators who joined the conversation emphasized that context and consent matter. Advising someone to conduct a DNA test is a deeply personal suggestion that should never be made publicly, particularly when there is no indication of conflict. They warned that normalizing such comments online could erode trust within families and promote a culture of suspicion, where joy and pride in parenthood are constantly undermined by fear of betrayal.

The exchange also reignited debate about the role of social media blogs in amplifying sensitive conversations. Platforms like Instablog9ja thrive on viral moments, but critics argue that reposting comments that question a child’s paternity, even as “content,” can have real emotional consequences. In this case, while Yhemo Lee appears unbothered on the surface, many users pointed out that such narratives linger online and can affect families long after trends move on.

Yhemo Lee, known for his outspoken personality and humorous takes on life, has built a brand that blends entertainment with relatability. Since becoming a father, he has occasionally shared moments that reflect pride and affection for his child, making Oscar’s comment feel, to many fans, like an unnecessary attempt to puncture a moment of happiness. The actor has not issued any further statement beyond his initial reply, a silence that some interpret as confidence and others see as a deliberate refusal to dignify the suggestion with explanation.

Beyond the personalities involved, the incident underscores a broader cultural shift in Nigeria’s online space, where boundaries between public interest and private life are increasingly blurred. As DNA testing becomes more accessible and more frequently discussed, the challenge lies in ensuring that conversations around it are handled with sensitivity and respect. What might be framed as “advice” can easily be perceived as accusation, especially when delivered in a public comment section watched by thousands.

In the end, the viral moment may fade, but the questions it raises remain relevant. How much access should the public have to the personal lives of celebrities? At what point does concern turn into intrusion? And in a society grappling with trust issues amplified by social media, how can conversations about sensitive topics like paternity be approached without causing harm?

For now, Yhemo Lee’s pointed “Oscar na your hurt?” stands as a reminder that not every thought needs to be typed, and not every “concern” needs a public audience. In an era where comment sections have become arenas for unsolicited opinions, the actor’s response resonates with many Nigerians who believe that some lines, once crossed, deserve to be firmly redrawn.